Didn't he write something to do with a magical land behind some sort of locked door, or whatever? There may be a few fuzzy childhood memories about reading, or having such a storybook told to you and your long-forgotten elementary school friends out loud when you were little, and that's about it as far as any grand awareness goes. What I find so interesting about both sets of replies is what it can tell us about what might be termed the artistic awareness of the viewers and readers of stories
What it helps the critic to discover is the actual limits of pop-culture memory. What I've found is that it's an often slippery slope, one in which even the greatest of artistic names can fall through the cracks of cultural awareness and literacy if you're not too careful. Let's take one other example of what I mean, before moving on to the main subject. Let's take the streak of Blockbuster Comedies that appeared during the 1980s. Who do you associate most with those films? My guess is that most people today would have trouble recalling the comedians who starred in those pictures, or what made them, for a time, a series of household names. A few might be able to recall the likes of Bill Murray, Eddie Murphy, or John Candy. And yet sometimes its difficult to recall the exact details. So here's the deal, if it's tough for most people at this time to remember even the basic plot of a film like Ghostbusters, what are the odds anyone's going to remember that time when an old children's author wrote a Cosmic Horror story? I'd say odds are good no one would ever have a clue such a thing even existed.
This appears to be about as far as pop-culture is able to take anyone anywhere. It's a rough gig, and what's hip today may barely cast a glare in the rear-view mirror of tomorrow. The funny thing is how a short attention span does little to erase the past. It also can't stop a lot of old, obscure works of fiction from existing. It's one of those cases where if you're enough of a bookworm, sooner or later you might kick over a metaphorical rock, and discover a rich load of undiscovered writings you never knew existed. At least that's sort of the case with my finding out about the story under discussion today. It's the kind of discovery I wasn't expecting to make when I fist picked up a simple book of short stories. All that happened was I got hold of a collection with the unassuming title of 13 Uncanny Tales, Chosen and Edited by Roger Lancelyn Green. He's another writer of forgotten children's books, and as I'd liked or enjoyed some of the stuff he's written before, this didn't seem like that much of an unnatural choice to make. It also didn't hurt that this time Green was editing together a collection of Horror stories.The truth is I've been a sucker for that type of writing since almost before I learned to read. It was spotting a kid's Gothic novel by John Bellairs that made me want to pick up my first book. I've been perusing through pages ever since. So the idea of yet another anthology dedicated to the October Country genre was music to my ears, at least. I picked up Green's book, leafed through the Table of Contents, and there it was. Forms of Things Unknown, by C.S. Lewis. I'd heard of the guy, of course. The first time I recall ever hearing anything about him was once when I caught the preview of an old, animated TV special that was made from one of his books, on the Disney Channel. A few years later, I had this same story read to me by one of my teachers way back in elementary school. I suppose that's how a whole generation in the 80s and 90s grew up hearing about him. It's like there was this brief span of time when Lewis was part of this informal group of writers that kids would either pick up on their own, or else they would come in contact with his work the way I did, by having adults read the stories out loud to us, either alone, or in a group. That's how most us remember him, so far as we can.
As I've already said, though. I wasn't expecting to run across him in a book of short stories dedicated to the Macabre. Nor was I expecting this same guy to set his work in the great expanse of outer space. In fact, I'm not sure I know of many people who would ever have expected him to do such a thing. For most of us, he's just this half-remembered name on a list of a handful of literary babysitters we used to have when we were kids. That list might have included the likes of Dr. Seuss and R.L. Stine, and not many others. In that sense, it's kind of a wonder that at least 50% of the audience can still recall Lewis at all. To discover that one of your old, nursery school teachers could have this other writing career, one you never even knew about, is interesting to say the least. It's like discovering that one of your school teachers once tried a turn towards novel writing without telling anyone, thus creating this odd sense of confusion and intrigue. That fact that one editor decided this work classified as Horror just went to sweeten the deal for me. It's not what I expected, and yet it got my interest. Enough of it, anyway, so that I wound up intrigued enough to want to know more about this left-field offering.
So far, the best bits of background information I've been able to dig up on this story boils down to just two sources. The first and oldest is The Shorter Planetary Fiction of C.S. Lewis, by Bruce R. Johnson. The second, and only other source I could find is Suzanne Bray's Close Encounters of the Mythical Kind. It's in the latter essay that Bray comes closest to giving the average reader anything resembling an insight into where a story like this might have come from. "When asked about how he wrote his fictional works, Lewis always asserted that these “began by seeing pictures in [his] head” (“It All Began” 79), sometimes pictures he had seen years before he started writing. For example, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, published in 1950, began “with a picture of a Faun carrying an umbrella and parcels in a snowy wood” (79), which had been in Lewis’s mind since he was about sixteen. In the same way, “Forms of Things Unknown” probably started with a frightening dream Lewis described in a letter to his father in March 1927...
"I dreamed I was walking among the valleys of the moon—a world of pure white rock, all deep chasms and spidery crags, with a perfectly black sky overhead. Of course there was nothing living there, not even a bit of moss: pure mineral solitude. Then I saw, very far off, coming to meet me down a narrow ravine, a straight, tall figure, draped in black, face and all covered. One knew it would be nicer not to meet that person: but one never has any choice in a dream, and for what seemed about an hour I went on till this stranger was right beside me . . . it was the sense of being on the moon you know, the complete desolateness, which gave the extraordinary effect. (Letters 1 678).
"However, both this dream, and the later short story, may have been influenced by his reading of H.G. Wells’s novel The First Men in the Moon (1901),
which Lewis particularly admired and which has, in places, an
atmosphere similar to the one found in “Forms of Things Unknown.”
Describing the novel to the Cambridge University English Club, Lewis
stated: 'The
first glimpse of the unveiled airless sky, the lunar landscape, the
lunar levity, the incomparable solitude, then the growing terror,
finally the overwhelming approach of the lunar night—it is for these
things that the story. . . exists. (“Science Fiction” 86). Lewis also
asked his listeners in Cambridge whether any man is “such a dull clod
that he can look at the moon through a good telescope without asking
himself what it would be like to walk among those mountains under that
black, crowed, sky” (85), implying that he himself had certainly done
so (web)". This scrap of useful information leaves a number of interesting thoughts in the readers mind. For me, what's most fascinating about all this comes down to just two things. The first would have to be this almost shared sens of surprise among the majority of the audience. I doubt there are a great many people who would have expected someone like C.S. Lewis to enjoy the Solar System.
The second has to do with Lewis's skill in describing that eerie "picture" he saw in one of his dreams. That being the image of what, to me, sounds like a basic sort of death's head figure making its slow way toward the viewer as it glides, ghost-like, over the rocky, bleached-out terrain of the Lunar surface. There's just this odd sense of creepy power to the idea in Lewis's dreams. There's this quality to it that might be described as a terrifying glamour. It puts the proper sense of artistic fear into the reader, while at the same time being able to draw their attention towards it, with the extra addition of this weird (or perhaps wyrd is the more proper term) "fascination" the creative idea has about it, for lack of a better word. A part of the draw for this creative picture can be put down to Lewis's skill and the already evident ease that he has with the elements of description. This dream, or nightmare, appears to date from an early time, perhaps before he even published his first, tentative works. If that's the case, then Bray has more than one good reason to showcase it in her essay. The composer of these words is the type that already sounds like he might have a lot going for him. Even if you never knew who was speaking, any good reader could tell these were the words of someone who could be a talented writer.
What makes this all sorts of interesting, for me at least, is that, once more, these words don't come from an obvious source. Th image that's being painted suggests a fear of mortality in relation to the vast and boundless oceans of the cosmos. It's the sort of image you expect to find within the correspondence of someone like H.P. Lovecraft, or Clark Ashton Smith. Instead, the fact it comes from the pen of someone like Lewis just adds to the sense of intrigue. It's like learning he has maybe not a Lovecraftian, though perhaps something near to a Bradbury like streak in him, one that never got as much attention as his current reputation testifies. The final source of power for this early dream correspondence can all be found in the image itself. The ultimate reason I can find for the strength of Lewis's descriptions is very simple, though perhaps also complex. The short of it is that he seems to have encountered an archetype in his sleep. It's just a case of the Imagination putting in a good night's work, in other words. It's the sort of thing that happens to everybody, yet creative types like Lewis tend to notice it, or place a greater deal of importance on it, than the rest us. However puzzling that may be.
Either way, the facts are discernible enough in this case. Lewis manages to capture a snapshot of this dream in his waking memory, and his latent artistic abilities as a wordsmith allowed him to make his readers see that veiled figure making its inexorable way toward the audience. In my mind, it moves like a slow-motion time-lapse film. First there's just the surface of the Moon. Then the dark figure appears at the top of a horizon. A brief fade-cut, and then the figure is walking down the hill. Another time stamp jump and the hooded thing keeps making its way closer until...That's when you begin to realize how at least some folk would maybe begin to wonder if its possible to find a story tucked away in the folds of that image. For instance, what if the first ever explorers to arrive at the Sea of Tranquility got out of the Lander, only to find that same gaunt, imposing, personage coming right towards them. It's the stuff that both nightmares and potentially good campfire yarns are made of. The real surprise remains that Lewis appears to have been of roughly the same type of mind. He must have been if he was able to tell a whole Tale of Terror out of it. This, then, is an idea of just how it all goes.